Due to the improvement that statistical data provide studies regarding psychology, the courses offering curriculum under the said subject increased over the years. PhD courses have even included such curriculum into their system of learning so as to give their students the proper training they need when it comes to developing data interpretation based on quantitative research approach. It has been realized through time that the logical balance between quantitative and qualitative study design in psychology helps in improving former knowledge into forming new and innovative condition of understanding the deeper essence of human sciences. Through the development of the curriculum offered in universities with regards statistical measurement design in studies and researches, the process of interpreting data through mathematical logic has advanced and is now considered as the base foundation of several researchers as they intend to explore the different conditions of development in the society.
Through the progressive training that students get from universities with regards the appropriate utilization of quantitative interpretation alongside qualitative definition of a particular study, they learn how to balance out the resulting condition of the information they are able to gather from research. From such balance comes a better interpretation that appears to be more applicable and practical in comparison with the former systems of research used in psychology in the past years of study.
What makes modern consideration of logical interpretation of data through quantitative design of research more applicable today is that more research studies have been proven effective and valid in defining their subjects through mathematical variable distinction. The unbiased presentation of facts through mathematical measurement avoids the marginal mistakes that qualitative studies often acquire especially when it comes to interpreting personal opinions and condition of thinking of participants in several research procedures.
Aiken, L. West, S.G.; Millsap, R.E. (2008). Doctoral Training in Statistics, Measurement, and Methodology in Psychology. Replication and Extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno’s (1990) Survey of PhD Programs in North America. The American Psychologist.
Cone, JD. (1991). Training in Measurement: Always the Bridesmaid. The American Psychologist.